<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quality in chemical software - the debate continues</title>
	<link>http://www.simbiosys.com/blog/2008/06/03/quality-in-chemical-software-the-debate-continues/</link>
	<description>Addressing the challenges of computational drug discovery</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 03:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Unilever Centre for Molecular Informatics, Cambridge - petermr&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.simbiosys.com/blog/2008/06/03/quality-in-chemical-software-the-debate-continues/#comment-1485</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.simbiosys.com/blog/2008/06/03/quality-in-chemical-software-the-debate-continues/#comment-1485</guid>
					<description>[...] ZZ: Quality in chemical software - the debate continues [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ZZ: Quality in chemical software - the debate continues [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

